Let’s see if I’ve got this straight:
There is a supernatural God out there
Who desperately wants us to believe in him
Yet deliberately hides from us direct evidence of himself
Well, I mean, except for miracles, right?
Yet what is the definition of a miracle
But the blatant intervention of a supernatural God into
the natural world
In other words
A discrete addition or removal of energy from an
otherwise closed system
For Theists, this is what a miracle must be
Or else matter and physics must be considered
substantially unreal altogether
Question: Given
that the most commonly reported miracle is a mental one
(i.e. the intervention of a supernatural God into the
thinking brains of persons)
Then why don’t we see more Theists exploring neuroscience?
Looking for a tell-tale anomalistic blip of energy going
in or out of the brain?
Or at least searching for the interface where soul should
meet gray matter?
Is it because ultimately Theists (like most religious
persons)
Don’t want to risk posing their theology in a falsifiable
way?
Alas, for the Theism, testing for God has always been
considered heresy in any form
Else its dogma could not wield such authority.
---
Yet consider an alternative:
Everything is IN God, rather than BY God
All matter and all minds, every known thing and every mystery is IN God
All matter and all minds, every known thing and every mystery is IN God
And miracles, should they be real, must occur within the
net energy of the universe
Otherwise known as ‘God’
Nevertheless the good news put forth by Pan-en-theism
Is that God can never hide
Let alone require conditional beliefs
Of other-worldly hidden forces
For the desperate sake of our slippery souls
So let us allow physics and phenomenology
To speak wholly and plainly to our faith
To speak wholly and plainly to our faith
Alas for Pan-en-theism, perhaps the best way to have faith
Is simply
IN God.
IN God.
No comments:
Post a Comment